4.6 Article

Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to Meckel's cave and the middle fossa: surgical technique and outcome

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages 235-241

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2000.92.2.0235

Keywords

meningioma; Meckel's cave; petrous bone; surgical approach

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Object. The goal of this study was to determine whether some petroclival tumors can be safely and efficiently treated using a modified retrosigmoid petrosal approach that is called the retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach (RISA). Methods. The RISA was introduced in 1983, and since that time 12 patients harboring petroclival meningiomas have been treated using this technique. The RISA includes a retrosigmoid craniotomy and drilling of the supra meal-us petrous bone, which is located above and anterior to the internal auditory meatus, thus providing access to Meckel's cave and the middle fos:a. Radical tumor resection (Simpson Grade I or II) was achieved in nine (75%) of the 12 patients. Two patients under went subtotal resection (Simpson Grade LII), and one patient underwent complete resection of tumor at the posterior fossa with subtotal resection at the middle fossa. There were no deaths or severe complications in this series; all patients did well postoperatively, being independent at the time of their last follow-up examinations (mean 5.6 years). Neurological deficits included facial paresis in one patient and worsening of hearing in two patients. Conclusions. The approach described here is a useful modification of the retrosigmoid approach, which allows resection of large petroclival tumors without the need for supratentorial craniotomies. Although technically meticulous, this approach is not time-consuming; it is safe and can produce good results. This is the first report on the use of this approach for petroclival meningiomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available