4.8 Article

Targeted inhibition of calcineurin prevents agonist-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.3.1196

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL062927, HL-69562, HL-62927] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [T32 ES07051, T32 ES007051] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiac hypertrophy is a major predictor of future morbidity and mortality. Recent investigation has centered around identifying the molecular signaling pathways that regulate cardiac myocyte reactivity with the goal of modulating pathologic hypertrophic programs. One potential regulator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is the calcium-sensitive phosphatase calcineurin. We show here that calcineurin enzymatic activity, mRNA, and protein levels are increased in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes by hypertrophic agonists such as angiotensin II, phenylephrine, and 1% fetal bovine serum. This induction of calcineurin activity was associated with an increase in calcineurin A beta (CnA beta) mRNA and protein, but not in CnA alpha or CnA gamma. Agonist-dependent increases in calcineurin enzymatic activity were specifically inhibited with an adenovirus expressing a noncompetitive peptide inhibitor of calcineurin known as cain [Lai, M. M., Burnett, P. E., Wolosker, H., Blackshaw, S, & Snyder, 5. H. ('1998) J. Biol, Chem, 273, 18325-18331]. Targeted inhibition of calcineurin with cain or an adenovirus expressing only the calcineurin inhibitory domain of AKAP79 attenuated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and atrial natriuretic factor expression in response to angiotensin II, phenylephrine. and 1% fetal bovine serum. These data demonstrate that calcineurin is an important regulator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in response to certain agonists and suggest that cyclosporin A and FK506 function to attenuate cardiac hypertrophy by specifically inhibiting calcineurin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available