4.7 Article

Continuous infusion of cyclosporin A postinjury significantly ameliorates cortical damage following traumatic brain injury

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 2, Pages 631-637

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/exnr.1999.7282

Keywords

trauma; cortical contusion; immunosuppressant

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS31220] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in the rapid necrosis of cortical tissue at the site of injury. In the ensuing hours and days, secondary injury exacerbates the original damage resulting in significant neurological dysfunction. Recent reports from our lab demonstrate that a bolus injection of the immunosuppressant cyclosporin A (CsA) is neuroprotective following TBI. CsA transiently inhibits the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and maintains calcium homeostasis in isolated mitochondria. The present study utilized a unilateral controlled cortical impact model of TBI to assess whether the neuroprotective effects of CsA could be extended by chronic infusion. Adult rats were subjected to a moderate (2 mm) cortical deformation and the extent of cortical damage was assessed using modern stereological techniques. Animals were administrated a 20 mg/kg intraperitoneal bolus of CsA or vehicle 15 min postinjury and osmotic minipumps were implanted subcutaneously to deliver CsA (4.5 or 10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. All animals receiving CsA demonstrated a significant reduction in lesion volume, with the highest dose offering the most neuroprotection (74% reduction in lesion volume). These results extend our previous findings and demonstrate that chronic infusion of CsA is neuroprotective following TBI. These findings also suggest that the mechanisms responsible for tissue necrosis following TBI are amenable to manipulation. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available