4.6 Article

Heart diseases prediction based on ECG signals' classification using a genetic-fuzzy system and dynamical model of ECG signals

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 291-296

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2014.08.010

Keywords

Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals classification; ECG signals dynamical model; Genetic algorithm; Genetic-fuzzy system; Fuzzy logic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The early detection of abnormal heart conditions is vital to identify heart problems and avoid sudden cardiac death. The people with similar heart conditions almost have similar electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. By analyzing the ECG signals' patterns one can predict arrhythmias. Since the conventional methods of arrhythmia detection rely on observing morphological features of the ECG signals which are tedious and very time consuming, the automatic detection of arrhythmia is more preferable. In order to automate detection of heart diseases an adequate algorithm is required which could classify the ECG signals with unknown features according to the similarities between them and the ECG signals with known features. If this classifier can find the similarities precisely, the probability of arrhythmia detection is increased and this algorithm can become a useful means in laboratories. In this article a new classification method is presented to classify ECG signals more precisely based on dynamical model of the ECG signal. In this proposed method a fuzzy classifier is constructed and its simulation results indicate that this classifier can segregate the ECGs with an accuracy of 93.34%. To further improve the performance of this classifier, genetic algorithm is applied where the accuracy in prediction is increased up to 98.67%. This proposed method increases the accuracy of the ECG classification regarding more precise arrhythmia detection. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available