4.8 Article

Fatal myeloproliferation, induced in mice by TEL/PDGFβR expression, depends on PDGFβR tyrosines 579/581

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages 423-432

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI8902

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K08CA81197-01, P01CA66996-01, P01 CA066996] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [P01OK50654] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The t(5;12)(q33;p13) translocation associated with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) generates a TEL/PDGF beta R fusion gene. Here, we used a murine bone marrow transplant (BMT) assay to test the transforming properties of TEL/PDGF beta R in vivo. TEL/PDGF beta R, introduced into whole bone marrow by retroviral transduction, caused a rapidly fatal myeloproliferative disease that closely recapitulated human CMML. TEL/PDGF beta R transplanted mice developed leukocytosis with Gr-1(+) granulocytes, splenomegaly, evidence of extramedullary hematopoiesis, and bone marrow fibrosis, but no lymphoproliferative disease. We assayed mutant forms of the TEL/PDGF beta R fusion protein - including 8 tyrosine to phenylalanine substitutions at phosphorylated PDGF beta R sites to which various SH2 domain-containing signaling intermediates bind - for ability to transform hematopoietic cells. All of the phenylalanine (F-) mutants tested conferred IL-3-independence to a cultured murine hematopoietic cell line, but, in the BMT assay, different P-mutants displayed distinct transforming properties. In transplanted animals, tyrosines 579/581 proved critical for the development of myeloproliferative phenotype. F-mutants with these residues mutated showed no sign of myeloproliferation but instead developed T-cell lymphomas. In summary, TEL/PDGF beta R is necessary and sufficient to induce a myeloproliferative disease in a murine BMT model, and PDGF beta R residues Y579/581 are required for this phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available