4.5 Article

Consequences to hearing during the conservative management of vestibular schwannomas

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 250-255

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200002010-00012

Keywords

acoustic neuroma; hearing loss; nonsurgical management; vestibular schwannoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To estimate the risk of loss of serviceable hearing during the conservative management of vestibular schwannomas. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Methods: Twenty-five patients with a radiological diagnosis of unilateral vestibular schwannoma were managed conservatively for a mean duration of 43.8 months (range, 12-194 mo). The pure-tone average (PTA) (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz) and speech discrimination scores (SDS) were measured at regular intervals throughout the entire duration of follow-up. Serviceable hearing was defined using two criteria: 70% SDS/30 dB PTA (the 70/30 rule) and 50% SDS/50 dB PTA (the 50/50 rule). The size and growth rate of tumors were determined according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery guidelines (1995). Intervention was recommended if there was evidence of continuous or rapid radiological tumor growth, and/or increasing symptoms or signs suggestive of tumor growth, Results: The risk of loss of serviceable hearing for the total group was 43% using the 70/30 rule and 42% using the 50/50 rule. Tumor growth was considered significant (> 1 mm) in 8 tumors (32%) and nonsignificant in 17 (68%). The risk of loss of serviceable hearing for the tumor-growth group was 67% using the 70/30 rule and 80% using the 50/50 pule. In contrast, the risk of loss of serviceable hearing for the no tumor-growth group was 25% using the 70/30 rule and 14% using the 50/50 rule. No audiological factors predictive of tumor growth were identified. Conclusions: There is a significant risk of loss of serviceable hearing during the conservative management of vestibular schwannomas. This risk appears to be greater in tumors that demonstrate significant growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available