4.6 Article

Differences in somatic perception in female patients with irritable bowel syndrome with and without fibromyalgia

Journal

PAIN
Volume 84, Issue 2-3, Pages 297-307

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00215-8

Keywords

irritable bowel syndrome; fibromyalgia; female; somatic perception

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01RR00425-27S2] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and fibromyalgia (FM) an considered chronic syndromes of altered visceral and somatic perception, respectively. Because there is a significant overlap of IBS and FM, shared pathophysiological mechanisms have been suggested. Although visceral perception has been well studied in IBS, somatic perception has npt. Aims: To compare hypervigilance and altered sensory perception in response to somatic stimuli in patients with IBS, IBS + FM, and healthy controls. Methods: Eleven IBS females (mean age 40), 11 IBS + FM females (mean age 46), and ten healthy female controls (mean age 39) rated pain perception in response to pressure stimuli administered to active somatic tender points, non-render control points and the T-12 dermatome, delivered in a predictable ascending series, and delivered in an unpredictable randomized fashion (fixed stimulus). Results. Although IBS patients had similar pain thresholds during the ascending series compared with controls, they were found to have somatic hypoalgesia with higher pain thresholds and lower pain frequency and severity during fixed stimulus series compared with IBS + FM patients and controls (P < 0.05), Patients with IBS + FM were more bothered by the somatic stimuli and had somatic hyperalgesia with lower pain thresholds and higher pain frequency and severity. Conclusions: Both hypervigilance and somatic hypoalgesia contribute to the altered somatic perception in IBS patients. Co-morbidity with FM results in somatic hyperalgesia in IBS patients. (C) 2000 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available