Journal
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 320, Issue 7231, Pages 376-377Publisher
B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7231.376
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Many systematic reviews are inconclusive and reinforce the message that there is clinical uncertainty. Phil Alderson and Ian Roberts argue that journals should make a point of publishing such reviews rather than waiting for reviews that show marked benefit or harm. Some experts disagree, however, but we failed to persuade them to commit their views to print.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available