3.8 Article

Fast quantification of the urinary marker of oxidative stress 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine using solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with triple-stage quadrupole mass detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B
Volume 738, Issue 2, Pages 311-317

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4347(99)00542-3

Keywords

oxidative stress; 8-hydroxy-2 '-deoxyguanosine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exogenous and endogenous oxidants constantly cause oxidative damage to DNA. Since the reactive oxidants itself are not suitable for analysis, oxidized bases like 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (80HdG) are used as biomarkers for oxidative stress, either in cellular DNA or as elimination product in urine. A simple, fast and robust analytical procedure is described for urinary 8OHdG as an indicator of oxidative damage in humans. The adduct was purified from human urine by applying a single solid-phase extraction step on LiChrolut EN(R). After evaporation of the eluate, the residue was resolved and an aliquote was injected into a HPLC system with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The limit of detection was 0.2 ng ml(-1) (7 fmol absolute) when using one product ion as quantifier and two further product ions as qualifier. The coefficient of variation was 10.1% (n=5 at 2.8 ng ml(-1) urine). The sample throughput was about 50 samples a day. Thus, this method is more sensitive and much faster than the common method using HPLC with electrochemical detection. The results of a study with nine volunteers investigated at six time-points each over 5 days are presented. The mean excretion of 80HdG was 2.1 ng mg(-1) creatinine (range 0.17-5.9 ng mg(-1) creatinine; 4 of 53 samples were below the LOD). A relatively large intra(relative SD 66%) and inter-individual (relative SD 71%) variation in urinary 8OHdG excretion rates was found. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available