4.7 Article

Molecular control of irreversible bistability during trypanosome developmental commitment

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 211, Issue 2, Pages 455-468

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201506114

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Centre for Immunity, Infection, and Evolution at the University of Edinburgh
  2. Wellcome Trust Strategic Award [WT095831, WT097945]
  3. Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award [WT103740, WT101842]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M009556/1]
  5. BBSRC [BB/M009556/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M009556/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei involves developmental transitions that allow survival, proliferation, and transmission of these parasites. One of these, the differentiation of growth-arrested stumpy forms in the mammalian blood into insect-stage procyclic forms, can be induced synchronously in vitro with cis-aconitate. Here, we show that this transition is an irreversible bistable switch, and we map the point of commitment to differentiation after exposure to cis-aconitate. This irreversibility implies that positive feedback mechanisms operate to allow commitment (i.e., the establishment of memory of exposure to the differentiation signal). Using the reversible translational inhibitor cycloheximide, we show that this signal memory requires new protein synthesis. We further performed stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture to analyze synchronized parasite populations, establishing the protein and phosphorylation profile of parasites pre- and postcommitment, thereby defining the commitment proteome. Functional interrogation of this data set identified Nek-related kinase as the first-discovered protein kinase controlling the initiation of differentiation to procyclic forms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available