4.5 Article

Comparison of the effects of Mg-6Zn and Ti-3Al-2.5V alloys on TGF-β/TNF-α/VEGF/b-FGF in the healing of the intestinal tract in vivo

Journal

BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/9/2/025011

Keywords

Mg-Zn alloy; degradable; in vivo; healing; angiogenesis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901422, 51271117]
  2. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Interdisciplinary (Biomedical Engineering) Research Fund [YG2010MS45]
  3. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Science and Technology Fund [09XJ21005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the different effects of Mg-6Zn alloy and Ti-3Al-2.5V alloy implants in intestinal tract healing, we compared these two different alloys with respect to their effect on a rat's intestinal tract, using serum magnesium, radiology, pathology and immunohistochemistry in vivo. It was found using the scanning electron microscope that the Mg-6Zn alloy began to degrade during the first week and that the Ti-3Al-2.5V alloy was non-degradable throughout the process. The Mg-6Zn alloy did not have an impact on serum magnesium. Superior to the Ti-3Al-2.5V alloy, the Mg-6Zn alloy enhanced the expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in healing tissue, and promoted the expression of both the vascular endothelial growth factor and the basic fibroblast growth factor, which helped angiogenesis and healing. The Mg-6Zn alloy reduced the expression of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) at different stages and decreased inflammatory response, which may have been related to the zinc inhibiting TNF-alpha. In general, the Mg-6Zn alloy performed better than Ti-3Al-2.5V at promoting healing and reducing inflammation. The Mg-6Zn alloy may be a promising candidate for use in the pins of circular staplers for gastrointestinal reconstruction in medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available