4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant depressions: A multicenter study

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 276-286

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00304-2

Keywords

Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS); treatment-resistant depression; bipolar disorder; electrical stimulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Vagus nerve simulation (VNS) delivered by the Neurocybernetic Prosthesis (NCP) System was examined for its potential antidepressant effects. Methods: Adult outpatients (n = 30) with nonpsychotic, treatment-resistant major depressive (n = 21) or bipolar I (n = 4) or II (n = 5; depressed phase) disorders who had failed at least two robust medication trials in the current major depressive episode (MDE) while on stable medication regimens completed a baseline period followed by NCP System implantation. A 2-week, single-blind recovery period (no stimulation) was followed by 10 weeks of VNS. Results: In the current MDE (median length = 4.7 years), patients had not adequately responded to two (n = 9), three (n = 2), four (n = 6), or five or more (n = 13) robust antidepressant medication trials or electroconvulsive therapy (n = 17). Baseline 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS28) scores averaged 38.0. Response rates (greater than or equal to 50% reduction in baseline scores) were 40% for both the HDRS28 and the Clinical Global Impressions- Improvement index (score of 1 or 2) and 50% for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Symptomatic responses (accompanied by substantial functional improvement) have been largely sustained during long-term follow-up to date. Conclusions: These open trial results suggest that VNS has antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depressions. Biol Psychiatry 2000;47:276-286 (C) 2000 Society of Biological Psychiatry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available