4.1 Article

Proteolysis of Plasmodium falciparum surface antigen, Pfs230, during gametogenesis

Journal

MOLECULAR AND BIOCHEMICAL PARASITOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 77-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-6851(99)00201-7

Keywords

malaria; Falciparum; Plasmodium falciparum; sexual stage proteins; antigens; surface; Pfs230; stage-specific processing; parasite proteases

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI40592-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During Plasmodium falciparum gametogenesis, proteolysis of Pfs230, a 360 kDa gametocyte surface protein, generates two large polypeptides, 307 and 300 kDa, that remain associated with the surface of the newly formed gamete. Using peptide specific antibodies. the amino termini of the 307 and 300 kDa forms have been mapped to between aa 477-487 and aa 523-555, respectively. which is the region between the glutamate rich repeats and the cysteine motif domains. Concomitantly. two peptides, 47 and 35 kDa, corresponding to the region upstream from the cleavage site are released into the medium. The membrane permeant cysteine protease inhibitor, E64d, blocks production of the 300 and 35 kDa forms of Pfs230. but does not alter the formation of the 307 or 47 kDa forms. In contrast, E64, which has been shown to inhibit the development of P. falciparum trophozoites, does not block proteolytic processing of Pfs230. Production of both the 307 and 300 kDa forms was reduced by a metallo-protease inhibitor, 1,10-phenanthroline. whereas the rest of the protease inhibitors rested had no effect on Pfs230 processing. This is the first study of proteolysis during gametogenesis and it demonstrates that the two large forms of Pfs230 produced ale generated by proteases with different specificities. The data also suggest that Pfs230 undergoes proteolytic processing prior to emergence from the red blood cell. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available