4.4 Article

Facilitatory I wave interaction in proximal arm and lower limb muscle representations of the human motor cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages 1426-1434

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.3.1426

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Facilitatory I wave interaction in proximal arm and lower limb muscle representations of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 83: 1426-1434, 2000. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human motor cortex elicits direct and indirect (I) waves in the corticospinal tract. Facilitatory I wave interaction has been demonstrated with a suprathreshold first stimulus CSI) followed by a subthreshold to threshold second stimulus (S2). Intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) can be studied by another paired TMS paradigm with a subthreshold conditioning stimulus (CS) followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus. Facilitatory I wave interaction in motor representations other than the hand area and its relationship to ICI and ICF has not been studied. We studied I wave interaction, ICI and ICF in an intrinsic hand muscle (abductor pollicis brevis, APE), in a proximal arm muscle (biceps brachii, BE) and in a lower limb muscle (tibialis anterior, TA) in 11 normal subjects. I wave facilitation was studied by paired TMS at 24 interstimulus intervals (ISIs) from 0.5 to 5.1 ms. For APE and TA, facilitation occurred in three distinct peaks at ISIs of 0.9-1.7, 2.5-3.5, and 4.1-5.1 ms. For BE, facilitation was significant for the first two peaks. The latencies of the peaks were similar among different muscles, but the magnitude of facilitation was much greater for APE and TA compared with BE. For all three muscles, changing the S2 to transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) resulted in much less facilitation of the first peak. For APE, there was significant I wave facilitation with S2 at 72% motor threshold (MT). The same stimulus used as the CS did not elicit ICF at ISI of 15 ms, suggesting that the threshold for eliciting I wave facilitation is lower than that for ICF. For BE and TA, there: was no I wave facilitation with S2 at 90% of APE MT, and the same stimulus used as CS led to ICI. Thus in BE and TA the threshold for eliciting ICI is lower than that for I wave facilitation. We conclude that the circuits that mediate I wave interactions are present in the proximal arm and lower limb representations of the motor cortex. I wave facilitation occurs predominately in the cortex and may be primarily related to the monosynaptic corticomotoneuronal (CM) system. The reduced I wave facilitation for BE compared with APE and TA may be related to less extensive CM projection and involvement of other polysynaptic descending pathways. I wave facilitation, ICI, and ICF appears to be mediated by different neuronal circuits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available