4.2 Article

Prevalence and predictors of post-traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages 35-51

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1348/014466500163095

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To identify the prevalence and potential predictors of post-traumatic stress type symptoms following labour. Design. A large sample, within-participants design with initial assessment and postal follow-up was utilized. Method. Two hundred and sixty-four women who had 'normal' births assessed within 72 hours on potential predictive measures and at 6 weeks partum for levels of symptoms of intrusions, avoidance and hyperarousal questionnaire derived from DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, criteria. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were also assessed. were post- on a 1994) Results. Three per cent showed questionnaire responses suggesting clinically significant levels or, all three post-traumatic stress dimensions and a further 24% on at least one of these dimensions. Forward stepwise regression analysis yielded models fur predicting outcome variables. Perceptions of low levels of support from partner and staff, patterns of blame and low perceived control in labour were found to be particularly related to experience of post-traumatic stress symptoms. Personal vulnerability factors such as previous menial health difficulties and trait anxiety were also related tc such symptoms as well as being relevant predictors for anxiety and depression. Conclusions. A proportion of women reports all three aspects of post-traumatic stress type symptoms following childbirth with many more reporting some components. A broader conceptualization of post-partum distress which takes account of the impact of labour is required. There may be opportunities for prevention through providing care in labour that enhances perceptions of control and support.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available