Journal
CHILD DEVELOPMENT
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages 323-328Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00147
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Feldman et al. criticize the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs) as having too much variability, too little stability, and insufficient ability to predict early language delay. We present data showing that these characteristics of the CDI are authentic reflections of individual differences in early language development rather than measurement deficiencies. We also respond to their critical assertions concerning sociodemographic influences on the CDI scores.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available