4.7 Review

The role of tumor necrosis factor in the pathophysiology of heart failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 537-544

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00600-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [1 P50 HL 6348A5-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have focused their attention on the role of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in the development of heart failure. First recognized as an endotoxin-induced serum factor that caused necrosis of tumors and cachexia, it is now recognized that TNF participates in the pathophysiology of a group of inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease; The normal heart does not express TNF; however, the failing heart produces robust quantities. Furthermore, there is a direct relationship between the level of TNF expression and the severity of disease. In addition, both in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate that TNF effects:cellular and biochemical changes that mirror those seen in patients with congestive heart failure. Furthermore, in animal models, the development of the heart failure phenotype can be abrogated at least in part by anticytokine therapy. Based on information from experimental studies, investigators are now evaluating the clinical efficacy of novel anticytokine and anti-TNF, strategies in patients with heart failure; one such strategy is the use of a recombinantly: produced chimeric TNF alpha soluble receptor. Thus, in view of the emerging importance of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of heart disease, we review the biology of TNF, its role in inflammatory diseases, the effects of TNF on the physiology of the heart and the development of clinical strategies that target the cytokine pathways. (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available