4.4 Article

Method development and validation for the quantification of dasatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, imatinib, lapatinib, nilotinib, sorafenib and sunitinib in human plasma by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 466-476

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.2814

Keywords

LC-MS; MS; tyrosine kinase inhibitors; therapeutic drug monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To support pharmacokinetic-guided dosing in individual patients, a fast and accurate method for simultaneous determination of anticancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) dasatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, imatinib, lapatinib, nilotinib, sorafenib and sunitinib in human plasma was developed using high-performance liquid chromatography and detection with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Stable isotopically labeled compounds of the eight different TKIs were used as internal standards. Plasma proteins were precipitated and an aliquot of supernatant was directly injected onto a reversed phase chromatography system consisting of a Gemini C18 column (50x2.0mm i.d., 5.0 mu m particle size) and then compounds were eluted with a gradient. The outlet of the column was connected to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with electrospray interface. Ions were detected in the positive multiple reaction monitoring mode. This method was validated over a linear range from 20.0 to 10,000ng/mL for erlotinib, gefitinib, imatinib, lapatinib, nilotinib and sorafenib, and from 5.00 to 2500ng/mL for dasatinib and sunitinib. Results from the validation study demonstrated good intra- and inter-assay accuracy (<13.1%) and precision (10.0%) for all analytes. This method was successfully applied for routine therapeutic drug monitoring purposes in patients treated with the investigated TKIs. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available