4.1 Article

Genomic distribution and functional characterisation of two distinct and conserved Plasmodium falciparum var gene 5′ flanking sequences

Journal

MOLECULAR AND BIOCHEMICAL PARASITOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 103-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-6851(00)00176-6

Keywords

malaria; Plasmodium; var genes; PfEMP1; promoter; transfection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Approximately 50 highly diverse var genes distributed throughout the haploid genome of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum code for PfEMP1 variants located on the surface of infected erythrocytes. PfEMP1 is involved in cytoadherence of parasitised red blood cells and undergoes antigenic variation through differential expression of var genes. Members of the var gene family are located in chromosome-internal positions on chromosomes 4, 7, 8 and 12, and in subtelomeric regions of all chromosomes. Here we show that there are two distinct and conserved types of 5' upstream regions (var 17-type and 5B1-type) of mi genes, and suggest that most subtelomeric var genes are flanked by a var 17-type 5' upstream sequence. In contrast, 5B1-type 5' upstream are localised to chromosomes that have been shown to contain var genes within chromosome-internal regions. Transcriptional analysis using RT-PCR revealed that var genes flanked by either type of 5' upstream sequence are transcribed in in vitro cultured trophozoite stage parasites. In addition, we have shown that the 5' flanking sequences of four different var genes are able to drive transient expression of the cat reporter gene. Our results suggest that at least the minimal regulatory sequences required for transcription of var genes are conserved among both subgroups of the cai gene family. Furthermore, these sequences provide new markers for the investigation of the chromosomal organisation of cai genes. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available