4.6 Article

Trends in sputter yield data in the film deposition regime

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 61, Issue 12, Pages 8516-8525

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.8516

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowing the fundamental trends of sputter yield in the sputtering regime used for film deposition is crucial for understanding the mechanisms of sputter deposition, interpreting yield data, and predicting the results of experiments. One source of experimental yield data is the comprehensive compilation [N. Matsunami, Y. Yamamura, Y. Itikawa, N. Itoh, Y. Kazomata, S. Miyagawa, K. Morita, R. Shimizu, and H. Tawara, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 31, 1 (1984)]. They published graphical yield-energy curves based on empirical parameters which were best tits to nearly all the projectile-target combinations available in 1983. We interpret this experimental data using theoretical results from a simplified collisional model of sputtering. For 1-keV noble gas projectiles, several trends show forth (some old and some new): First, there is a repeating pattern in the dependence of yield on target atomic number, with the period being each row of the periodic Table. Second, surface binding energy is the single most important target parameter; the yield varies roughly as 1/U-sb(1.3) for the empirical data, but as 1/U-sb(0.5) for the pure linear cascade sputtering mechanism. Third, while the principal mechanism is the linear cascade, the nonlinear cascade makes a detectable contribution to the experimental yield for yield values above similar to 1. Fourth, for target atomic numbers above similar to 35, the yield increases monotonically with projectile mass; for lighter targets the yield exhibits a maximum at an intermediate projectile mass. Fifth, the energy dependence of yield for a given projectile-target combination from similar to 0.5 to 2 keV is, to a good approximation, Y(E)infinity E-0.5. Scatter due to experimental error is evident in the data: Matsunami er at's approach of combining the results of different experiments, resulting in their empirical yield curves, is useful far compensating for this.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available