4.6 Article

Lead targets GRP78, a molecular chaperone, in C6 rat glioma cells

Journal

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 163, Issue 3, Pages 260-266

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/taap.1999.8878

Keywords

lead-induced protein; lead-binding protein; GRP78; chaperones; C6 glioma cells; astroglia

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES-05871, T32 ES07273, P30 ES-09106] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exposure to potentially neurotoxic levels of lead (Pb) occurs in about 9% of American children under 6 years of age. Astroglia in the brain serve as a Pb depot, sequestering Pb and preventing its contact with the more sensitive neurons. Astroglia have the capacity to adapt to Pb exposure, and as such are able to tolerate relatively high intracellular Pb accumulation. This tolerance mechanism has yet to be defined in biochemical terms. In the present study, we present evidence that glucose-regulated protein (GRP78), a molecular chaperone in the ER, participates directly or indirectly in the tolerance mechanism. Exposure of cultured C6 rat glioma cells, an astroglia-like cell line, to 1 mu M Pb acetate for 1 week raised the intracellular levels of two proteins, one of which was identified by sequence analysis as GRP78, GRP78 accumulation started within 1 day and progressed with time of exposure. Studies in vitro showed that GRP78 bound tightly to affinity columns with Pb2+ as the affinity ligand and bound weakly when either Zn2+ or Ni2+ replaced the Pb2+. The reduced form of GSH and BSA did not compete with GRP78 to chelate Pb2+. However, the heavy metal binding domain (HMB) of Menkes protein competed with GRP78 for chelating Pb2+. The data provide evidence that GRP78 may be a component of the Pb tolerance mechanism through its direct interaction with Pb2+. Its increased synthesis could be part of the adaptive response to Pb exposure. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available