4.4 Article

Emotional processing in schizophrenia across cultures: standardized measures of discrimination and experience

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 57-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00093-6

Keywords

culture; emotion discrimination; mood induction; schizophrenia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Schizophrenia appears quite similar across a range of cultures. However, variability has been noted, and understanding the variant and invariant features of the disorder is necessary for elucidating its biological and environmental basis. Evidence of prominent emotion processing deficits in schizophrenia, including perceptual and experiential aspects, led us to extend the paradigm of standardized measures cross-culturally. We assessed performance of American, German, and Indian patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls on standardized emotion discrimination and experience (mood induction) procedures using happy, sad, and neutral facial expressions of Caucasian actors. Participants were 80 Americans (40 patients; 40 controls), 48 Germans (24 patients; 24 controls), and 58 Indians (29 patients; 29 controls). Face discrimination performance was impaired across patient groups, but was most impaired in those of Indian origin. Lower performance was also found in Indian controls, relative to their American and German counterparts. Mood induction produced weaker effects in all patient groups relative to their respective controls. The results supported the feasibility of cross-cultural comparisons and also emphasized the importance of poser ethnic background for facial affect identification, while poser ethnicity was less consequential for mood induction effects. Emotion processing deficits in schizophrenia may add to the clinical burden, and merit further examination. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available