4.5 Article

Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion: loss of pupillary reflex, visual impairment and retinal neurodegeneration

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 859, Issue 1, Pages 96-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)01937-5

Keywords

chronic hypoperfusion; retina; vision; pupillary reflex

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adult rats underwent permanent bilateral occlusion of the common carotid arteries (2VO) to determine the effect of chronic cerebral ischemia on vision and retina. They were monitored post-surgically for the presence of the pupillary reflex to light. Some rats were tested for 6 months post-surgically on a radial arm maze task and then tested in another water-escape task which explicitly tested visual function. Another group of rats were tested post-surgically for 3 months on a task which simultaneously assessed visual and tactile discrimination ability. The thicknesses of the retinal sub-layers were then measured fur some rats. Fourteen of the 25 rats that underwent 2VO lost the pupillary reflex. This seemed to occur within 5 days. Rats that lost the pupillary reflex but not rats whose reflex was intact, were impaired on all visually guided mazes. Tactile discrimination ability was unaffected. Only rats that lost the pupillary reflex showed reduced thickness of the retinal outer nuclear and plexiform layers, reduced cell density in the retinal ganglion cell layer and astrocytosis and degeneration of the optic tract. We conclude that 2VO can eliminate the pupillary reflex. Photoreceptors and retinal ganglion cells degenerate, but it is unclear if these are the cause(s) or result(s) of the loss of the pupillary reflex. These effects are accompanied by impairment of visually guided behavior. The possibility that visual system damage may also occur in acute ischemia merits further investigation. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available