4.8 Article

In vivo evaluation of post-operative pain reduction on rat model after implantation of intraperitoneal PET meshes functionalised with cyclodextrins and loaded with ropivacaine

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages 260-270

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.032

Keywords

Post-operative pain; Visceral mesh; Cyclodextrin polymer; Ropivacaine; Colorectal distension; Drug delivery

Funding

  1. Plate-forme Ressources Experimentales (D.H.U.R.E), University of Lille 2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The avoidance of post-herniorrhaphy pain can be challenging for hernia repair and has the greatest impact on patient's quality of life, health care utilisation and cost to society. Visceral meshes, functionalised with an efficient drug carrier system hydroxypropyl beta-cyclodextrin polymer (polyHP beta CD) coating, were developed to give a prolonged intraperitoneal analgesic drug release. We attempted to evaluate the in vivo pain-relief efficacy of ropivacaine loaded polyHP beta CD functionalised polyester meshes in a rat model of visceral pain induced by colorectal distension (CRD). In vivo safety, pharmacokinetic profile and biodegradation were measured via histological analysis and high-performance liquid chromatography, etc. The results confirmed that the polyHP beta CD on the functionalised meshes has a high adsorption capacity of ropivacaine and resulted in a sustained drug release in rats after mesh implantation. This was further reaffirmed by an elevated pain threshold (30%) up to 4 days after implantation in the rat CRD model, compared to 1-2 days for non-adapted meshes. Neither polyHP beta CD nor the loaded ropivacaine had a major impact on the inflammatory response. This evidence strongly suggests that polyHP beta CD functionalised visceral mesh could be a promising approach for post-operative pain control by improving the intraperitoneal drug delivery and bioavailability. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available