4.8 Article

Molecular. mechanisms underlying the enhanced functions of three-dimensional hepatocyte aggregates

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 2162-2171

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.063

Keywords

Three-dimensional cell culture; Bioreactor; Hepatocyte; Microarray; Gene expression; Spheroid

Funding

  1. American College of Surgeons Resident Research Scholarship
  2. UCSF Liver Center Pilot/Feasibility [P30-DK026743]
  3. National Institutes of Health [K08-DK093708]
  4. [UH3-AG037628]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional (3D) culture of hepatocytes leads to improved and prolonged synthetic and metabolic functions, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are unknown. In order to investigate the role of 3D cell cell interactions in maintaining hepatocyte differentiated functions ex vivo, primary mouse hepatocytes were cultured either as monolayers on tissue culture dishes (TCD) or as 3D aggregates in rotating wall vessel (RWV) bioreactors. Global gene expression analyses revealed that genes upregulated in 3D culture were distinct from those upregulated during liver development and liver regeneration. Instead, they represented a diverse array of hepatocyte-specific functional genes with significant over-representation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (Hnf4a) binding sites in their promoters. Expression of Hnf4a and many of its downstream target genes were significantly increased in RWV cultures as compared to TCD. Conversely, there was concomitant suppression of mesenchymal and cytoskeletal genes in RWV cultures that were induced in TCDs. These findings illustrate the importance of 3D cell cell interactions in maintaining fundamental molecular pathways of hepatocyte function and serve as a basis for rational design of biomaterials that aim to optimize hepatocyte functions ex vivo for biomedical applications. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available