4.8 Review

Microfluidic techniques for development of 3D vascularized tissue

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 35, Issue 26, Pages 7308-7325

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.091

Keywords

Vascularization; Tissue engineering; Vasculogenesis; Angiogenesis; Microfluidics; Micromolding

Funding

  1. American University of Beirut, Lebanon
  2. FRQS (Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Sante) Quebec, Canada
  3. Strategic Technologies Program of King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) [12-MED3096-03]
  4. Euro-TransBio BiMoT project [ETB-2012-32]
  5. National Science Foundation CAREER Award [DMR 0847287]
  6. office of Naval Research Young National Investigator Award
  7. National Institutes of Health [HL092836, DE019024, EB012597, AR057837, DE021468, HL099073, EB008392]
  8. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of a vascularized tissue is one of the key challenges for the successful clinical application of tissue engineered constructs. Despite the significant efforts over the last few decades, establishing a gold standard to develop three dimensional (3D) vascularized tissues has still remained far from reality. Recent advances in the application of microfluidic platforms to the field of tissue engineering have greatly accelerated the progress toward the development of viable vascularized tissue constructs. Numerous techniques have emerged to induce the formation of vascular structure within tissues which can be broadly classified into two distinct categories, namely (1) prevascularization-based techniques and (2) vasculogenesis and angiogenesis-based techniques. This review presents an overview of the recent advancements in the vascularization techniques using both approaches for generating 3D vascular structure on microfluidic platforms. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available