4.8 Article

The performance of a small-calibre graft for vascular reconstructions in a senescent sheep model

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 35, Issue 33, Pages 9033-9040

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.008

Keywords

In vivo test; Biocompatibility; Vascular graft; Polyurethane; Nanocomposite

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is an acute clinical need for small-calibre (<6 mm) vascular grafts for surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term performance of a small-calibre graft produced from a nanocomposite biomaterial, polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane poly(carbonate-urea)urethane (POSS-PCU), in a large animal model following Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) protocols. Grafts were characterised and implanted into the left carotid artery (LCA) of senescent sheep (n = 11) for a period of 9 months. In vivo compliance and blood flow rates were measured using ultrasound wall tracking software and a Transonic flow meter. Graft patency and degree of intimal hyperplasia (IH) were examined at the study end point. Seven of the POSS-PCU grafts were free from thrombosis, IH, calcification and aneurysmal dilation, with 4 occluding within 14 days. All of the ePTFE controls (n = 4) were found to be occluded by day 32. The lumen of the patent POSS-PCU grafts was free from any cellular deposits, whilst perigraft tissue could be seen to be infiltrating into the body of the graft from the adventitia. No significant differences were detected between the blood flow rates (p = 0.3693) and compliance (p = 0.9706) of the POSS-PCU grafts and the native artery, either post-operatively or after 9 months implantation. Small-calibre vascular grafts produced from POSS-PCU offer a viable option for the clinical use in revascularisation procedures with a patency rate of 64%. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available