4.3 Article

Outcomes of glued foldable intraocular lens implantation in eyes with preexisting complications and combined surgical procedures

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 1839-1844

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.006

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual outcomes and complications of glued foldable intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with a wide range of ocular pathologies and/or having combined surgical procedures. SETTING: New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A chart review was conducted of all glued foldable IOL procedures performed in eyes with absent or insufficient capsule support. Patients with a postoperative follow-up less than 3 months were excluded from analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, the postoperative course, and visual and refractive outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-five eyes (64 patients) were evaluated over a mean follow-up of 9.1 months +/- 6.2 (SD). Ocular comorbidities were present in 98.5% of eyes, and 95.4% had additional concurrent surgical procedures. There was a statistically significant improvement in corrected distance visual acuity (P =.046), with 89.2% of eyes achieving better or equal vision postoperatively. Intraoperative complications included ocular hemorrhage (10.8%), haptic deformation (10.8%), and haptic breakage (1.5%). Postoperative complications included elevated intraocular pressure (13.8%), optic capture (12.3%), persistent anterior chamber inflammation (6.2%), IOL tilt (4.6%), cystoid macular edema (3.1%), recurrent ocular hemorrhage (3.1%), and retinal detachment (1.5%). CONCLUSION: The glued foldable IOL technique resulted in favorable visual outcomes but with a moderate risk for IOL-related and other postoperative complications in eyes with complex ocular comorbidities having combined surgical procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available