4.8 Article

The use of cationic microbubbles to improve ultrasound-targeted gene delivery to the ischemic myocardium

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages 2107-2116

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.041

Keywords

Microbubble; Gene therapy; Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction; Ischemic myocardium; Heart function; AKT

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP119507, MOP102535]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We synthesized a cationic microbubble (CMB) with the aim of enhancing its DNA-carrying capacity to improve targeted gene transfection of the ischemic heart for cardiac regeneration. We previously reported that ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) employing the commercial Definity microbubble (MB) successfully transfected genes into rodent hearts, but the transfection efficiency was modest. We synthesized a CMB and compared its DNA-carrying capacity and reporter gene transfection efficiency with the Definity MB. The CMB bound 70% more plasmid DNA than the Definity MB. UTMD-mediated gene delivery with the CMB enhanced both transfection efficiency and gene expression. In vivo studies assessed the ability of the CMB to deliver the therapeutic AICT gene to the ischemic rat myocardium and evaluated the effects on apoptosis, angiogenesis, and cardiac function. AKT transfection with the CMB reduced infarct size (p < 0.05), increased infarct thickness (p < 0.05), reduced apoptosis (p < 0.05), increased vascular density (p < 0.05), and improved cardiac perfusion and function (p < 0.05) compared to the Definity MB. Delivery of AICT with the CMB resulted in greater cardiac functional improvements compared to the Definity MB. UTMD therapy with this CMB provides an efficient platform for the targeted delivery of factors required to regenerate the ischemic heart and preserve cardiac function. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available