4.5 Article

Atypical protein kinases Cλ and -ζ associate with the GTP-binding protein Cdc42 and mediate stress fiber loss

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 2880-2889

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.8.2880-2889.2000

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 54389, R01 GM054389] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both the Rho family of low-molecular-weight GTP-binding proteins and protein kinases C (PKCs) mediate responses to a variety of extracellular and intracellular signals. They share many downstream targets, including remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, activation of p70(S6) kinase and c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and regulation of transcription and cell proliferation. We therefore investigated whether Rho family GTP-binding proteins bind to PKCs, We found that Cdc42 associates with atypical PKCs (aPKCs) PKC zeta and -lambda In a GTP-dependent manner. The regulatory domain of the aPKCs mediates the interaction, Expression of activated Cdc42 results in the translocation of PKC lambda from the nucleus into the cytosol, and Cdc42 and PKC lambda colocalize at the plasma membrane and in the cytoplasm, Expression of activated Cdc42 leads to a loss of stress fibers, as does overexpression of either the uild type or an activated form of PKC lambda. Kinase-dead PKC lambda and -zeta constructs acted as dominant negatives and restored stress fibers in cells expressing the activated V12 Cdc42 mutant, indicating that Cdc42-dependent Loss of stress fibers requires aPKCs, Kinase-dead PKC lambda and -zeta and dominant-negative N17 Cdc42 also blocked Ras-induced loss of stress fibers, suggesting that this pathway may also be important For Ras-dependent cytoskeletal changes. N17 Rac did not block Ras-induced loss of stress fibers, nor did kinase-dead PKC lambda block V12 Rac-stimulated loss of stress fibers. These results indicate that Cdc42 and Rac use different pathways to regulate stress fibers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available