4.8 Article

The absorption, distribution, excretion and toxicity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles in mice following different exposure routes

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 34, Issue 10, Pages 2565-2575

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.043

Keywords

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles; Toxicity; Exposure routes; Kinetics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81201814, 31270022, 81171454, 31271075]
  2. Beijing Nova Program [Z111103054511113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) are emerging as one of the promising nanomaterials for biomedical applications, but the nanomaterials body interaction exposed by different administration routes remained poorly understood. In the present study, a systematic investigation of the absorption, distribution, excretion and toxicity of silica nanoparticles (SNs) with the average size of 110 nm after four different exposure routes including intravenous, hypodermic, intramuscular injection and oral administration to mice were achieved. The results showed that a fraction of the SNs administrated by the intramuscular and hypodermic injection could cross different biological barriers into the liver but with a low absorption rate. Exposing by oral administration, SNs were absorbed into the intestinal tract and persisted in the liver. And SNs administrated by intravenous injection were mainly present in the liver and spleen. In addition, SNs could cause inflammatory response around the injection sites after intramuscular and hypodermic injection. It was also found that SNs were mainly excreted through urine and feces after different exposure routes. This study will be helpful for selecting the appropriate exposed routes for the development of nanomaterials-based drug delivery system for biomedical applications. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available