4.6 Article

Age-associated arterial wall thickening is related to elevations in sympathetic activity in healthy humans

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.4.H1205

Keywords

intima media thickness; ultrasonography; muscle sympathetic nerve activity; arterial remodeling

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL-39966] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG-06537, R01 AG-13038] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arterial wall hypertrophy occurs with age in humans and is a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease risk. The responsible mechanism is unknown, but data from studies in experimental animals suggest that elevated sympathetic-adrenergic tone may be involved. To test this hypothesis in humans we studied 11 young (29 +/- 1 yr; means +/- SE) and 13 older (63 +/- 1) healthy normotensive men under supine resting conditions. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) burst frequency (peroneal microneurography) was 70% higher in the older men (39 +/- 1 vs. 23 +/- 2 bursts/min; P < 0.001). Femoral artery intima media thickness (IMT; B-mode ultrasound) and the femoral IMT-to-lumen diameter ratio (IMT/lumen) were similar to 75% greater in the older men (both P < 0.001). Femoral IMT (r = 0.82) and the femoral IMT/lumen (r = 0.85) were strongly and positively related to MSNA (both P < 0.001). The significant age group differences in femoral IMT and the IMT/lumen were abolished when the influence of MSNA was removed. In contrast, the relationship between MSNA and femoral wall thickness remained significant after removing the influence of age. We conclude that 1) primary aging is associated with femoral artery hypertrophy in humans and 2) this is strongly related to elevations in sympathetic nerve activity to the vasculature. These results support the hypothesis that tonic elevations in sympathetic nerve activity may be an important mechanism in the arterial remodeling that occurs with human aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available