4.6 Article

Functional role of rat prelimbic-infralimbic cortices in spatial memory: evidence for their involvement in attention and behavioural flexibility

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages 113-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00168-0

Keywords

prefrontal cortex; planning of response; prospective memory; working memory; delayed non-matching to position task

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The involvement of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and more particularly the prelimbic and infralimbic cortices (PL-IL area), in spatial memory remains controversial. The present study investigates the effects of neurotoxic lesions restricted to the PL-IL area of the mPFC in rats trained in two different spatial tasks. In experiment I: PL-IL lesioned rats showed normal acquisition of a delayed non-matching to position task. They were also able to plan their responses for a prospective strategy but were transiently disrupted when the initial delay was extended. In experiment 2, rats were trained to locate one baited box among 13 identical boxes distributed on a circular arena. Lesioned rats performed normally when trained from a single start position but were severely disrupted when four start positions were used. A probe trial showed this deficit was not due to failure to learn the goal location. The addition of a proximal cue signalling the goal box helped lesioned rats to directly open the goal box, but did not compensate for greater distances that they travelled to reach it. Results from both experiments indicate that the PL-IL area is directly involved neither in allocentric spatial representations nor prospective,memory and is not specifically involved in working memory. This area seems more likely to be involved in both attentional processes and behavioural flexibility that may be important for processing information for working memory as well as for spatial memory. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available