4.8 Article

Impact of the nature, size and chain topologies of carbohydrate-phosphorylcholine polymeric gene delivery systems

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 33, Issue 31, Pages 7858-7870

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.004

Keywords

Block-statistical copolymers; Gene delivery; Cellular uptake; Nuclear localization; Progenitor cells

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the recent significant advances in the field polymer chemistry, it is now possible to produce well-defined and non-toxic cationic polymers with advanced molecular structures of desired molecular weights and compositions. Carefully engineered polymer architectures are found to impact significantly their DNA condensation and gene delivery efficacies. In a previous study, the statistical carbohydrates based copolymers were found to show high gene expression and low toxicity, however there aggregation in the presence of serum proteins was a major drawback. In this study, carbohydrate and phosphorylcholine based cationic polymers having a different architecture, compositions and varying molecular weights are produced and are termed as cationic 'block-statistical' copolymers. These cationic copolymers are evaluated for their gene delivery efficacies, interactions with serum protein, cellular uptake and nuclear localization ability. As compared to the statistical analogue, 'block-statistical' copolymers showed high gene expression, low interactions with serum proteins, as well as low toxicity in hepatocytes and human dermal fibroblasts. In addition, 2- methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) based 'block-statistical' copolymers and their sugar incorporated analogues were prepared and were found to serve as improved gene delivery vectors than their statistical analogues. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available