4.3 Article

Measurement of photographic quality and individual distinctiveness for the photographic identification of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae

Journal

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 355-374

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2000.tb00930.x

Keywords

humpback whale; Megaptera novaeangliae; photographic identification; individual identification; mark-recapture; photographic quality; individual animal distinctiveness; kappa statistics; cumulative logit model; categorical data analyses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate identification of humpback whales from photographic identification data depends on the quality of the photographs and the distinctiveness of the flukes. Criteria for evaluating photographic quality and individual distinctiveness were developed involving judgments about overall quality or distinctiveness and about specific aspects of each. These criteria were tested for the level of agreement among judges. The distinctiveness scheme was tested for the independence of distinctiveness judgments and photographic quality. Our results show that judges could agree when evaluating specific and overall aspects of photographic quality and individual distinctiveness. The level of agreement varied for different pairs of judges, and less adept judges were identified. Ability to agree on evaluations of photographic quality was independent: of the experience of the judges. Overall photographic quality and overall distinctiveness were successfully predicted from more specific variables, but the agreement between judges for these was not significantly greater than the agreement for the overall measures judged directly. There was no correlation between individual distinctiveness and photographic quality for four of the five judges, but the power of this test may be low. Analysts of photographic identification data frequently require evaluations of photographic quality and individual distinctiveness. To obtain reliable results from such analyses, evaluation schemes and judges should be tested to ensure reliable and consistent evaluations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available