4.8 Article

Theoretical considerations on mechanisms of harvesting cells cultured on thermoresponsive polymer brushes

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 33, Issue 20, Pages 4975-4987

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.060

Keywords

Cell culture; Fibronectin; Integrin; Membrane; Modeling; Protein adsorption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) brushes and hydrogels serve as temperature-responsive cell culture substrates. The cells adhere at 37 degrees C and are detached by cooling to below the lower critical solution temperature T-LCST approximate to 32 degrees C, an effect hitherto attributed to change in PNIPAM hydration. The article proposes a mechanism coupling the change of hydration to integrin mediated environmental sensing for cell culture on brushes and hydrogels in serum containing medium. Hydration is associated with swelling and higher osmotic pressure leading to two effects: (i) The lower osmotic pressure in the collapsed brush/hydrogel favors the adsorption of serum borne extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins enabling cell adhesion; (ii) Brush/hydrogel swelling at T < T-LCST gives rise to a disjoining force f(cell) due to confinement by the ventral membrane of a cell adhering via integrin-ECM bonds. f(cell) places the integrin-ECM bonds under tension thus accelerating their dissociation and promoting desorption of ECM proteins. Self consistent field theory of PNIPAM brushes quantifies the effect of the polymerization degree N, the area per chain Sigma, and the temperature, T on ECM adsorption, f(cell) and the dissociation rate of integrin-ECM bonds. It suggests guidelines for tuning Sigma and N to optimize adhesion at 37 degrees C and detachment at T < T-LCST. The mechanism rationalizes existing experimental results on the influence of the dry thickness and the RGD fraction on adhesion and detachment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available