4.7 Article

Response criteria for NHL:: Importance of 'normal' lymph node size and correlations with response rates

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 399-408

Publisher

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008332713631

Keywords

clinical trials; non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; response criteria

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Oncologic literature cites many different definitions of critical response measurements. Patients and methods: Response criteria (RC) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were developed by lymphoma experts, endorsed by international lymphoma clinicians, and applied to a 166-patient rituximab (Rituxan(R), MabThera(R)) trial by a third-party, blinded panel of NHL experts (LEXCOR). Retrospectively, we analyzed this data using variations of the original RC and comparing with recently published RC. Results: The definition of a 'normal' lymph node affected the complete response (CR) rate (less than or equal to 1.0 x 1.0 cm, 6%; less than or equal to 1.5 x 1.5 cm, 18%; less than or equal to 2.0 x 2.0 cm, 28%); overall response rate (ORR) was not affected. CR rates increased progressively without greater than or equal to 28 days response confirmation: 12% vs. 6% (less than or equal to 1.0 x 1.0 cm), 26% vs. 18% (less than or equal to 1.5 x 1.5 cm), and 36% vs. 28% (less than or equal to 2.0 x 2.0 cm). CR rate and duration of response (DR) were unaffected when only the six largest, rather than all lesions, were measured. When the new RC were applied, CR rate (32%) was higher and DR (13.9 months) and time to progression (15.6 months) were shorter in complete responders. Conclusions: Standard RC must be consistently and rigorously applied for accurate comparisons between studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available