4.8 Article

The spreading, migration and proliferation of mouse mesenchymal stem cells cultured inside hyaluronic acid hydrogels

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 39-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.103

Keywords

Hyaluronic acid; Hydrogel; Protease degradation; RGD peptide

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R21EB009516, R21EB007730] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM067555] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIBIB NIH HHS [R21 EB007730-02, R21 EB007730, R21 EB009516-02, R21 EB009516] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM067555, T32 GM067555-07] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthetic hydrogel scaffolds that can be used as culture systems that mimic the natural stem cell niche are of increased importance for stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. These artificial niches can be utilized to control the stem cell fate and will have potential applications for expanding/differentiating stem cells in vitro, delivering stem cells in vivo, as well as making tissue constructs. In this study, we synthesized hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels that could be degraded through a combination of cell-released enzymes and used them to culture mouse mesenchymal stem cells (mMSC). To form the hydrogels, HA was modified to contain acrylate groups and crosslinked through Michael addition chemistry using non-degradable, plasmin degradable or matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) degradable crosslinkers. Using this hydrogel we found that mMSC proliferation occurred in the absence of cell spreading, that mMSCs could only spread when both RGD and MMP degradation sites were present in the hydrogel and that mMSCs in hydrogels with high density of RGD (1000 mu M) spread and migrated faster and more extensively than in hydrogels with low density of RGD (100 mu M). (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available