4.8 Article

Engineered aprotinin for improved stability of fibrin biomaterials

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 430-438

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.109

Keywords

Fibrin; Degradation; Recombinant protein; Cross linking

Funding

  1. EuroSTEC (Soft Tissue Engineering of Congenital Birth Defects in Children)
  2. E U [LSHB-CT-2006-037409]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fibrin has been long used clinically for hemostasis and sealing yet extension of use in other applications has been limited due to its relatively rapid resorption in vivo even with addition of aprotinin or other protease inhibitors We report an engineered aprotinin variant that can be immobilized within fibrin and thus provide extended longevity When recombinantly fused to a transglutaminase substrate domain from alpha(2)-plasmin inhibitor (alpha 2PI1-8) the resulting variant aprotinin-alpha 2PI1-8 was covalently crosslinked into fibrin matrices during normal thrombin/factor XIIIa-mediated polymerization Challenge with physiological plasmin concentrations revealed that aprotinin-alpha 2PI1-8-containing matrices retained 78% of their mass after 3 wk whereas matrices containing wild type (WT) aprotinin degraded completely within 1 wk Plasmin challenge of commercial sealants Omrixil and Tisseel supplemented with aprotinin-alpha 2PI1-8 or WT aprotinin showed extended longevity as well When seeded with human dermal fibroblasts aprotinin-alpha 2PI1-8-supplemented matrices supported cell growth for at least 33% longer than those containing WT aprotinin Subcutaneously Implanted matrices containing aprotinin-alpha 2PI1-8 were detectable in mice for more than twice as long as those containing WT aprotinin We conclude that our engineered recombinant aprotinin variant can confer extended longevity to fibrin matrices more effectively than WT aprotinin in vitro and in vivo (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available