4.8 Article

Biofunctionalization of silicone polymers using poly(amidoamine) dendrimers and a mannose derivative for prolonged interference against pathogen colonization

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 19, Pages 4336-4346

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.056

Keywords

Polydimethylsiloxane; Oxidation; Dendrimer; Plasma; Bacterial adhesion; Biofilm

Funding

  1. NIH [HD058985]
  2. Gulf Coast Consortia [NIH 5R90DK071054-03]
  3. Welch Foundation [E-1498]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite numerous preventive strategies on bacterial adhesion, pathogenic biofilm formation remained the major cause of medical device-related infections. Bacterial interference is a promising strategy that uses pre-established biofilms of benign bacteria to serve as live, protective coating against pathogen colonization. However, the application of this strategy to silicone urinary catheters was hampered by low adherence of benign bacteria onto silicone materials. In this work, we present a general method for biofunctionalization of silicone (PDMS) as one of the most widely used materials for biomedical devices. We used mild CO2 plasma to activate PDMS surface followed by simple attachment of generation 5 (G5) poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers to generate an amino-terminated surface that were maintained even after storage in PBS buffer for 36 days. We then covalently attach a carboxy-terminated mannose derivative to the modified PDMS to promote the adherence of benign Escherichia colt 83972 expressing mannose-binding type 1 fimbriae. We demonstrated that dense, stable biofilms of E. coli 83972 could be established within 48 h on the mannose-coated PDMS. Significantly, this benign biofilm reduced the adherence of the uropathogenic Enterococcus faecalis by 104-fold after 72 h, while the benign bacteria on the unmodified substrate by only 5.5-fold. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available