4.8 Article

Construction of the recellularized corneal stroma using porous acellular corneal scaffold

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 29, Pages 6962-6971

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.084

Keywords

Corneal tissue engineering; Decellularization; Scaffold; Freezing dry; Porosity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30973246]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2009A030200004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acellular porcine cornea stroma (APCS) prepared using pancreatic phospholipase A(2) was proven to be promising corneal scaffold. However, its dense ultrastructure provides insufficient space that prevents the seeded cells from organizing into a functional tissue. In this report, freezing dry APCS (FD-APCS) biomaterials containing pores with different sizes were fabricated at different pre-freezing temperatures of -10, -80 or -198 degrees C, and the percentage of large pores (equivalent circle diameter >= 10 mu m) was 93.55%, 69.36%, 35.79%, while the small pores (< 10 mu m) were account for 6.45%, 30.64%, 64.21%, respectively. Both porosity and specific surface area increased in FD-APCS fabricated with decreased pre-freezing temperature, and they were dramatically higher than those in APCS. The three FD-APCS groups displayed higher permeability than APCS, and the -10 degrees C FD-APCS possessed the highest permeability. The keratocytes seeded in the FD-APCS construct survived well in vitro, and maximal cell proliferation was observed in the -10 degrees C FD-APCS. The light transmittance of the FD-APCS-transplanted cornea after interlamellar keratoplasty in rabbit eyes displayed no significant difference from the APCS-transplanted or native cornea. This study indicated that the porous FD-APCS prepared using pancreatic phospholipase A(2) is capable of serving as potential scaffold for constructing tissue-engineered cornea with biological properties. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available