4.8 Article

The effects of cross-linked thermo-responsive PNIPAAm-based hydrogel injection on retinal function

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 14, Pages 3620-3626

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.058

Keywords

Blood flow; Electroretinography; Drug delivery; Retina; Thermo-responsive hydrogel

Funding

  1. Lincy Foundation
  2. Macula Foundation
  3. Veterans Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is significant interest in biomaterials that provide sustained release of therapeutic molecules to the retina. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm)-based materials have received significant attention as injectable drug delivery platforms due to PNIPAAm's thermo-responsive properties at approximately 32 degrees C. While the drug delivery properties of PNIPAAm materials have been studied extensively, there is a need to evaluate the safety effects of hydrogel injection on retinal function. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEG-DA) crosslinked PNIPAAm hydrogel injection on retinal function. Utilizing scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO), optical coherent tomography (OCT), and electroretinography (ERG), retinal function was assessed following hydrogel injection. In region near the hydrogel, there was a significant decrease in arterial and venous diameters (similar to 4%) and an increase in venous blood velocity (similar to 8%) 1 week post-injection. Retinal thickness decreased (similar to 6%) at 1 week and the maximum a- and b-wave amplitudes of ERG decreased (similar to 15%). All data returned to baseline values after week 1. These data suggest that the injection of PEG-DA crosslinked PNIPAAm hydrogel results in a small transient effect on retinal function without any long-term effects. These results further support the potential of PNIPAAm-based materials as an ocular drug delivery platform. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available