4.8 Article

Spherical bioactive glass particles and their interaction with human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 1010-1018

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.082

Keywords

Bioactive glass; Sub-micron particles; Stem cells; Cytotoxicity; Cellular uptake

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/E057098/1]
  2. Royal Academy of Engineering
  3. EPSRC [EP/E057098/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E057098/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sub-micron particles of bioactive glass (SMBGs) with composition 85 mol% SiO2 and 15 mol% CaO were synthesised and characterised. Bioactivity was demonstrated by the formation of calcium apatite following 5 days immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF). The effect of a 24 h exposure of SMBGs (100 mu g/ml, 150 mu g/ml, 200 mu g/ml) to human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) on cell viability, metabolic activity and proliferation were determined using the LIVE/DEAD, MTT, total DNA and LDH assays after 1,4 and 7 days of culture. None of the SMBG concentrations caused significant cytotoxicity at 1 and 4 days, but the doses of 150 and 200 mu g/ml significantly decreased hMSC metabolic activity after 7 days of culture. Cell proliferation decreased as SMBG concentration increased; however none of the SMBGs tested had a significant effect on DNA quantity compared to the control. Confocal microscopy confirmed cellular uptake and localisation of the SMBGs in the hMSC cytoskeleton. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the SMBGs localised inside the cell cytoplasm and cell endosomes. These findings are important for assessing the toxicity of sub-micron particles that may either be used as injectables for bone regeneration or generated by wear or degradation of bioactive glass scaffolds. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available