4.6 Article

Clinical correlates and prognosis in early spindle coma

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 584-590

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00303-X

Keywords

spindle coma; prognosis; cardiac arrest; EEG; drugs; etiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the prognostic significance of spindle coma (SC) according to etiology and EEG reactivity. Methods: We reviewed 15 patients with SC due to various causes within 8 days of coma Co determine the prognostic significance of this EEC pattern. Results: The outcome among survivors was favorable: among 13 survivors, 9 were independent in all activities of daily living (ADLs) at 6 months; 3 were dependent in all ADLs; and one remained in coma. EEG reactivity to noxious stimuli best predicted outcome: All patients (whatever the coma etiology) with EEG reactivity survived; conversely, not all patients without EEG reactivity died. Conclusion: In our patients, EEG reactivity independent of etiology predicted survival, neurological examination did not predict outcome. Most SC survivors had a meaningful recovery achieving all ADLs. From the literature, the cause of SC was predictive of outcome: encephalopathy, seizures and trauma had the best prognosis while hypoxia, CRA and structural lesions carried the worst. Literature review, revealed that 23% of patients [56/242] died or remained in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). Best outcomes occurred when SC was due to drugs, encephalopathy or seizures: (0/14 died or were in a PVS). With trauma 15% [25/169] died or were in a PVS). Intermediate outcomes occurred with hypoxia and cardio-respiratory arrest (CRA): 33% [7/21] died or were in a PVS. The gravest outcomes occurred with brainstem and cerebral infarctions, and tumors: 73% [22/30] died or were in a PVS. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Led. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available