4.8 Article

The maintenance of pluripotency following laser direct-write of mouse embryonic stem cells

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 1802-1808

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.015

Keywords

Stem cell; Direct-write; Micropatterning; Gelatin; Cell viability; Pluripotency

Funding

  1. NIH [1R56DK088217-01]
  2. NSF [CBET 0846270, DBI 0922830]
  3. UAlbany
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [0922830] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0846270] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability to precisely pattern embryonic stem (ES) cells in vitro into predefined arrays/geometries may allow for the recreation of a stem cell niche for better understanding of how cellular microenvironmental factors govern stem cell maintenance and differentiation. In this study, a new gelatin-based laser direct-write (LDW) technique was utilized to deposit mouse ES cells into defined arrays of spots, while maintaining stem cell pluripotency. Results obtained from these studies showed that ES cells were successfully printed into specific patterns and remained viable. Furthermore, ES cells retained the expression of Oct4 in nuclei after LDW, indicating that the laser energy did not affect their maintenance of an undifferentiated state. The differentiation potential of mouse ES cells after LDW was confirmed by their ability to form embryoid bodies (EBs) and to spontaneously become cell lineages representing all three germ layers, revealed by the expression of marker proteins of nestin (ectoderm), Myf-5 (meso-derm) and PDX-1 (endoderm), after 7 days of cultivation. Gelatin-based LDW provides a new avenue for stem cell patterning, with precision and control of the cellular microenvironment. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available