Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 361-363Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600935
Keywords
iodine; urine; methods; epidemiology; evaluation studies
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: The most accurate way to measure urinary iodine excretion in epidemiological surveys is still debated. We propose a new principle of estimating iodine excretion based on casual urine samples. Material and methods: A total of 123 24 h urine samples and corresponding casual urine samples were collected from 31 subjects. Iodine excretion was expressed as 24 h iodine excretion and three different estimates: iodine concentration in the casual sample, iodine/gram creatinine in the casual sample, and the new principle-iodine/creatinine ratio in the casual sample, adjusted for expected creatinine excretion of the individual. Results: All three estimates based on casual urine samples correlated significantly to 24 h values with a r (Pearson) of 0.37 for iodine concentration, 0.61 for iodine/creatinine ratio and 0.62 for the age- and sex-adjusted iodine/creatinine ratio. The median iodine excretion in the entire group was 143 mu g/day in 24 h samples, 87 mu g/l as iodine concentration, 77 mu g/g creatinine as iodine/creatinine ratio and 126 mu g/day as age- and sex-adjusted iodine/creatinine ratio. Conclusion: Age- and sex-adjusted iodine/creatinine ratio is a more accurate and unbiased estimate of iodine excretion in epidemiological surveys of adults than the two most frequently used estimated: iodine concentration and iodine/gram creatinine, as these two estimates may introduce a bias depending on the composition of the investigated group. The adjusted iodine/creatinine ratio is superior to the other estimates, especially when individual estimates of 24 h iodine excretion is required or cohorts of selected groups are investigated. Sponsorship: This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Foundation Region Greater Copenhagen, Faroe Islands and Greenland; the Wedell-Wedellsborg Foundation; Musikforlaeggerne Agnes and Knut Marks Foundation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available