3.9 Article

Apomixis is not developmentally conserved in related, genetically characterized Hieracium plants of varying ploidy

Journal

SEXUAL PLANT REPRODUCTION
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 253-266

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s004970050193

Keywords

apomixis; apospory; Hieracium; seed; modifiers; adventitious embryony

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apomixis is facultative in characterized members of the genus Hieracium. The three components that comprise the apomictic mechanism include apospory followed by autonomous embryo and endosperm formation. The time of aposporous embryo sac initiation and mode of embryo sac formation are different in Hieracium piloselloides (D3) and Hieracium aurantiacum (A3.4). Genetic studies have shown that a single dominant locus encodes all three components of apomixis in both species (Bicknell ct al. 2000). We histologically examined a range of related, genetically characterized apomictic Hieracium plants derived from D3 and A3.4 to assess conservation of the apomictic mechanism in different genetic backgrounds. The plants varied in ploidy, and also in the amount of DNA introduced from sexual Hieracium pilosella (P4). An apomictic hybrid from a cross between the two apomicts was also examined. The developmental processes observed in the parental apomicts were not conserved in the examined plants and alterations occurred in the components of apomixis. One plant also exhibited adventitious embryony. The results show that other genetic factors can modify apomixis with respect to time of initiation, spatial location, and mode of developmental progression. Both the apomictic locus and the modifiers are essential for efficient penetrance of the trait in Hieracium. Some of the findings in Hieracium correspond with observations in Ranunculus and this is discussed in terms of models for apomictic development and the control of apomixis in crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available