4.8 Article

Controlled-size embryoid body formation in concave microwell arrays

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 15, Pages 4296-4303

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.115

Keywords

Concave microwell array; Embryonic stem cell differentiation; Neurogenesis; Cardiogenesis

Funding

  1. Korea Science and Engineer Foundation (KOSEF) [ROA-2007-000-20086-0]
  2. Korea Research Foundation
  3. Korean Government (MEST) [KRF-2008-220-D00133]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A2605, 2007-0056875] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Embryonic stem (ES) cells hold great potential as a renewable cell source for regenerative medicine and cell-based therapy. Despite the potential of ES cells, conventional stem cell culture methods do not enable the control of the microenvironment. A number of microscale engineering approaches have been recently developed to control the extracellular microenvironment and to direct embryonic stem cell fate. Here, we used engineered concave microwell arrays to regulate the size and shape of embryoid bodies (EBs) cell aggregate intermediates derived from ES cells. Murine ES cells were aggregated within concave microwells, and their aggregate sizes were controlled by varying the microwell widths (200, 500, and 1000 mu m). Differentiation of murine ES cells into three germ layers was assessed by analyzing gene expression. We found that ES cell-derived cardiogenesis and neurogenesis were strongly regulated by the EB size, showing that larger concave microwell arrays induced more neuronal and cardiomyocyte differentiation than did smaller microwell arrays. Therefore, this engineered concave microwell array could be a potentially useful tool for controlling ES cell behavior. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available