4.4 Review

Computational methods for the structural alignment of molecules

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 215-232

Publisher

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008194019144

Keywords

computational methods; review; structural alignment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In drug design, often enough, no structural information on a particular receptor protein is available. However, frequently a considerable number of different ligands is known together with their measured binding affinities towards a receptor under consideration. In such a situation, a set of plausible relative superpositions of different ligands, hopefully approximating their putative binding geometry, is usually the method of choice for preparing data for the subsequent application of 3D methods that analyze the similarity or diversity of the ligands. Examples are 3D-QSAR studies, pharmacophore elucidation, and receptor modeling. An aggravating fact is that ligands are usually quite flexible and a rigorous analysis has to incorporate molecular flexibility. We review the past six years of scientific publishing on molecular superposition. Our focus lies on automatic procedures to be performed on arbitrary molecular structures. Methodical aspects are our main concern here. Accordingly, plain application studies with few methodical elements are omitted in this presentation. While this review cannot mention every contribution to this actively developing field, we intend to provide pointers to the recent literature providing important contributions to computational methods for the structural alignment of molecules. Finally we provide a perspective on how superposition methods can effectively be used for the purpose of virtual database screening. In our opinion it is the ultimate goal to detect analogues in structure databases of nontrivial size in order to narrow down the search space for subsequent experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available