4.8 Article

The relationship between fibroblast growth and the dynamic stiffnesses of a DNA crosslinked hydrogel

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 1199-1212

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.050

Keywords

Dynamic stiffness; DNA crosslinked hydrogels; Crosslinking density; Projection area; Aspect ratio; FAK expression

Funding

  1. New Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord Research [07A-019-SCR1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microenvironment of cells is dynamic and undergoes remodeling with time. This is evident in development, aging, pathological processes, and at tissue-biomaterial interfaces, But in contrast, the majority of the biomimetic materials have static properties. Here, we show that a previously developed DNA crosslinked hydrogel circumvents the need of environmental factors and undergoes controlled stiffness change via DNA delivery, a feasible approach to initiate property changes in vivo, different from previous attempts. Two types of fibroblasts, L929 and GFP, were subject to the alterations in substrate rigidity presented in the hydrogels. Our results show that exogenous DNA does not cause appreciable cell shape change. Cells do respond to mechanical alterations as demonstrated in the cell projection area and polarity (e.g., Soft vs. Soft -> Medium), and the responses vary depending on magnitude (e.g., Soft -> Medium vs. Soft -> Stiff) and range of stiffness changes (e.g.. Soft -> Medium vs. Medium -> Stiff). The two types of fibroblasts share specific responses in common (e.g., Soft -> Medium), while differ in others (e.g., Medium -> Stiff). For each cell type, the projection area and polarity respond differently. This approach provides insight into pathology (e.g., cancer) and tissue functioning, and assists in designing biomaterials with controlled dynamic stiffness by choosing the range and magnitude of stiffness change. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available